What allows for a new theory of secondary service connection in a claim?

A new theory of secondary service connection in a claim can emerge from the acceptance of new evidence after a denial. This process acknowledges that veterans may present additional information or medical opinions that were not previously considered, which could establish a link between a service-connected condition and a new secondary condition. The ability to introduce credible new evidence after an initial denial opens up the possibility for the claim to be reevaluated, potentially leading to a different outcome.

In this context, the introduction of new evidence can significantly shift the perspective of the case, demonstrating that the secondary condition is indeed related to a service-connected disability. This is a standard principle in VA claims, ensuring that veterans have the opportunity to fully support their claims with relevant information, especially when new data arises that was not available during the initial review.

The other options do not align with the process for establishing a new theory of secondary service connection. Submission of irrelevant evidence would not bolster a claim; a lack of prior claims does not inherently open the pathway for a new theory; and the original condition claimed is not a prerequisite for establishing a secondary connection unless it has already been determined to be service-connected.